Print Article
Author's Bias | Interpretation: conservative | Inclination: promise | Seminary: none
When asked why He was teaching in parables by the disciples, Jesus responds with some enigmatic words:
"To you it has been granted to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them
it has not been granted." (Matt 13:11)
"To you it has been granted to know the mysteries of the kingdom of God, but to the rest
it is in parables, so that SEEING THEY MAY NOT SEE, AND HEARING THEY MAY NOT UNDERSTAND."
(Luke 8:10)
What did this mean and why does Jesus keep the kingdom of God a secret?
Before any attempt is made to make sense of any observations made of this passage, it is important to understand
what is currently happening: what is the histo-cultural context of this passage?
Opposition to Jesus had been steadily growing (Matt 9:3, 11, 14, 34;
10:25; 11:19),
and by Matthew 12,
Jewish opposition became more direct and pointed. Critical of Jesus' Sabbath activities, the Jews are enraged by
His authority and claim of deity, and it is here that the first mention of a plot to kill Jesus can be found
(Matt 12:14).
While Matthew 12:15-16 essentially
summarizes Mark 3:7-12,
Matthew 12:17-21 quotes
Isaiah 42:1-4 as a fulfillment of prophecy and presents Jesus'
healing ministry in terms of Yahweh's Suffering Servant. In contrast,
Mark 3:11 portrays Jesus' healing ministry in the messianic term
"Son of God".
The immediate context of Matthew 13
is understood against the events occurring in Matthew 12.
Since Jesus' response in Matthew 13:11
is part of the Parable of the Sower, this story can be used to locate the parallel passages in the other gospels,
and this can be seen in Mark 4:3-20 and
Luke 8:5-15. However, only
Mark 3:22-35 provides some context by recording and sharing
similar events as Matthew 12 leading up to the Parable of the
Sower. This is significant as the Parable of the Sower is the first of seven parables pertaining to the kingdom
of God.
In comparing the two accounts (Matt 12:1-50 vs
Mark 3:22), the Parables of the Kingdom
(Matt 13:1-53) appear to be a response to the events that took
place in Matthew 12:22-37 or
12:38-50.
Matthew 12:22-37
The Pharisees accuse Jesus of being the prince of demons, because He could exorcise
(vs. 22-24).
Jesus' reply: a divided kingdom cannot stand, and if the exorcism is accomplished by the Spirit
of God, then the kingdom of heaven has come upon you (vs. 25-28).
Jesus' argument is advanced: If Jesus' exorcisms cannot be attributed to Satan, then they
reflect an authority greater than Satan (vs. 29).
Jesus' inverted saying (He who is not with Me is against Me) reveals that faith is not
indifferent or neutral; one is either in or out. To willfully reject the work of the Spirit despite the fact that
there could be no other explanation of Jesus' exorcisms is unforgivable (vs.
30-32).
Matthew 12:38-50
The Pharisees respectfully ("Teacher") ask for a sign such as something that would immediately
confirm prophecy or something done at command that would remove their doubt of His miracles
(vs. 38).
Jesus' reply: the Pharisees represented the "wicked and adulterous generation" and only the
sign of Jonah will be given to them. Presuming that the Ninevites learned of what happened to Jonah and how he
got to their city, Jonah himself was the sign (Jonah 3:1-10).
Similarly Jesus is the sign; He will be delivered from certain death and be resurrected in three days attesting
that He is indeed the Christ. Like the Ninevites, the Queen of Sheeba
(1 Kings 10:1-13)
traveled to hear the wisdom of Solomon. Pagan people were more commendable than the Jewish nation who was
unresponsive to One who was greater than either Jonah and Solomon
(vs. 39-42).
Against the background of the Beelzebub controversy, Jesus warns the Pharisees the danger of
being reinhabited by demons once they've been cleansed. There is great risk for those who remain neutral about
Jesus, or require signs or fail to see that One greater than Jonah or Solomon is present
(vs. 43-45).
Jesus reveals what it really means to be committed to Him; He sets a priority of spiritual
relationships over natural ones. By doing His Father's will are the disciples identified as being a part of His
family (vs. 46-50).
Thus, while the Jews never denied the success of Jesus' miracles, they refused to accept the divine source
of His work and, more importantly, His deity. Jesus just did not fit their idea of the Messiah. With rising
opposition and people who proved themselves deaf to His claims, Jesus is encouraged to teach more in parables.
Jesus' method of teaching in parables did not start here
(Luke 5:36; 6:39)
but, in contrast to using parables to illustrate a truth, He uses the kingdom parables to present the truth about
Himself and the kingdom of heaven in a veiled way.
When asked why He was teaching in parables by the disciples, Jesus begins with, "To you it has been granted to
know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven, but to them it has not been granted. For whoever has, to him more
shall be given, and he will have an abundance; but whoever do not have, even what he has shall be taken away from
him." (Matt 13:11-12)
When establishing the covenant with Moses, God clearly lays out the qualifications of who will be
His priests:
"Now then, if you will indeed obey My voice and keep My covenant, then you shall be My own
possession among all the peoples, for all the earth is Mine; and you shall be to Me a kingdom of priests and a holy
nation. These are the words that you shall speak to the sons of Israel."
(Ex 19:5-6)
The Pharisees failed to qualify as God's own possession and thus were not granted to know the
mysteries of God.
In this passage of Matthew 13,
Jesus answers in terms of the elect, God's choice people, defined by those who have genuine faith in God
juxtaposed with the rebellion, spiritual dullness and unbelief of the Jew. And this is seen very clearly in Jesus'
reference to the prophecy of Isaiah 6:9-10 while speaking of
unbelieving Jews ("they") and the disciples ("you"). Matthew records Jesus' answer in the form of a well structured
chiasm.
Therefore I speak to them in parables;
1 because while seeing they do not see, and while
hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand.
2 In their case the prophecy of Isaiah is being
fulfilled, which says,
3 'YOU WILL KEEP ON HEARING, BUT WILL NOT UNDERSTAND;
4 YOU WILL KEEP ON SEEING, BUT WILL NOT PERCEIVE;
5 FOR THE HEART OF THIS PEOPLE
HAS BECOME DULL,
6 WITH THEIR EARS THEY SCARCELY HEAR,
7 AND THEY
HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES,
7' OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SEE WITH THEIR EYES,
6' HEAR WITH THEIR EARS,
5' AND UNDERSTAND WITH THEIR HEART AND RETURN, AND I
WOULD HEAL THEM.'
4' But blessed are your eyes, because they see;
3'
and your ears, because they hear.
2' For truly I say to you that many prophets and righteous men
1' desired to see what you see, and did not see it, and to hear what you hear, and did not hear it.
The literary beauty of the chiasm is apparent. It contrasts the faith of the disbelieving Jews (first half of the chiasm) with
that of the disciples (second half of the chiasm). In fulfilling Isaiah's prophecy, the apex of the chiasm emphasizes the volitional
aspect of faith and one's responsibility for its consequences:
AND THEY HAVE CLOSED THEIR EYES,
OTHERWISE THEY WOULD SEE WITH THEIR EYES,
It is apparent that that the first recipients of God's revelation bear responsibility for divine rejection when they fail to
"open their eyes" and become disciples on their own; yet nothing of what is taking place stands outside of God's control and plan.
If Jesus really wanted to keep a secret from anyone outside of His circle of disciples, he would not have spoken to them. His was
concerned about His mission (Matt 9:35-38;
10:1-10; 28:16-20);
however, He preached here in a manner without casting His pearls before pigs (Matt 7:6).
The kingdom parables do not simply convey information nor mask it, but challenge the audience with eyes to see and ears to hear.
"Everything in the Sacred Books shines and glistens, even in its outer shell: but the marrow of it is sweeter:
if you want the kernel, you must break the shell."
St. Jerome, Epist. LXIX, 400 A.D.
References:
1. Brown C, ed., The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology, vol. 3, Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, (1979).
2. Gaebelein F, ed., The Expositor's Bible Commentary: Matthew, Mark, & Luke, Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, (1992).
3. Walvoord JF and Zuck RB, eds., Bible Knowledge Commentary, Wheaton: Victor Books, (1985).
Copyright ©
2011
Helpmewithbiblestudy.org. All rights to this material are reserved. We encourage you to print the material for personal and
non-profit use or link to this site. If you find this article to be a blessing, please share the link so that it may rise in
search engine rankings.