A Series on Whether a Christian Can Have a Demon
Can Christians have a demon and / or be controlled by one? Is all sin, problem or health issue a consequence
of a Christian’s insincere faith or lack thereof? Is it legitimate to consider a demonic cause of Christian’s
problem or health issue when normal solutions fail as remedies? While understanding God’s sovereignty is very
difficult, there are legitimate concerns among those who affirm the possibility that Christians can have a demon:
- Failure to recognize the power of demonic forces causes the Christian to underestimate or acknowledge the
reality of spiritual warfare that is upon them. There is a tendency to ignore the spiritual perspective and
instead prefer the naturalistic explanation.
- Ignorance and denial of demonization, along with the passionate debate that produces factions within the
church, is certainly in keeping with what Satan would intend.
What biblical evidence is there that supports the position that Christians can be indwelt and demonized? This
will review some of the passages used to support the idea that Christians can be demonized.
Examine the cases of possible demonic invasion of Believers before the crucifixion of Christ and Pentecost:
Cain’s angry reaction to God’s refusal to accept for his offering
Scholars have long noted the grammatical difficulties and awkward translation of the Hebrew in
The ambiguities are removed by viewing the Hebrew word robes (translated as "crouching"),
not as a participle modifying the term "sin," but as an Akkadian loan word rabisum, which means "demon."
From this perspective, the translation of Genesis 4:7 becomes:
If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is a
demon at the door; and its [the demon’s] desire is for you, but you must master it [the demon].
Some scholars view Genesis 4:7, taken with
1 John 3:12’s
characterization of Cain as "of the evil one," as suggesting the possibility that Cain was inhabited by a demon
during his rebellion against God. However, is "demon" used as a metaphor and was Cain a Believer?
Balaam’s questionable behavior and status as a prophet of God
Was Balaam a Believer, because he spoke the word of God?
Some consider Balaam as a Believer, because he was a prophet of God
(Num 22:9, 20;
Since Balaam was noted as a "diviner" or "soothsayer"
a supernatural ability provided by an indwelling demon
some see Balaam as an example of a demonized Believer.
While the Bible does not explicitly say that Balaam was demonized, there is evidence that
Balaam was not a Believer. Balaam was never noted as a prophet of God, and the Old Testament prophets condemned
the practice of divination and soothsaying (Is 2:6;
57:3; Jer 27:9;
The New Testament never saw Balaam as an example of a Christian.
Peter compares Balaam to false prophets and teachers
(2 Pet 2:15-16).
Jude speaks of non-abiding Christians as being covetousness "in the error of Balaam"
In Revelations 2:14, John refers to the
"teaching of Balaam," which was instructing others to place a stumbling block before the children of Israel. What
exactly was John referring to? In this case, the seduction of the Israelites by the women of Moab to worship Baal
(Num 25:1-3) was attributed to Balaam’s apparent advice to Balak
as a method to defeat Israel.
The terrorizing of King Saul by an evil spirit
(1 Sam 16:14-23;
In this instance, after the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul
(1 Sam 16:14),
an evil spirit comes upon him. From the verbs "on" (1 Sam 16:16)
and "upon" (1 Sam 18:10),
there is the suggestion that the evil spirit was external to King Saul.
However, some see Saul’s abrupt personality and behavioral change
(1 Sam 18:10-11;
as forms of mind and body control seen only in cases of demonization such as the Gerasene demoniac
While the text is absent of any Hebrew words that are similar to the Greek terms for demonization
(daimonizomai and echein daimonion), this is seen as evidence of a demonized Believer.
The trial of Job by Satan
It should be noted that God had a protective hedge about Job, which prevented any fallen angel
from afflicting him. In allowing Satan’s initial assault, God forbade Satan from touching Job. In the second
assault, it appears that Satan may have touched Job and produced the skin boils.
An interesting side note is that it is God who brings up Job’s name to Satan’s attention!
The woman who was bent over for 18 years
In this case, a demonic being was inside the woman. Many theologians debate whether this woman
was a Christian or not.
In Luke 13:16, Jesus identifies the afflicted
woman as "a daughter of Abraham." This term is used only once in the New Testament, and the debate is whether Jesus
is referring to the woman as a physical Jew or a believing (spiritual) Jew.
In Luke 19:9, Jesus refers to Zacchaeus as "a
son of Abraham," which identifies him as a Jewish believer. Jesus pronounced Zacchaeus’ salvation, because of his
In John 8:37, 56, Jesus identifies the
Pharisees as Abraham’s physical descendants; however, He makes the distinction that they are not true children of
Abraham (John 8:37-47). And His discussion is within the context
of the Pharisees’ spiritual state.
In Matthew 3:9 and
Luke 3:8, addressing the Pharisees (who were associated with the
laymen of Israel and based their faith on the Law of Moses, Scriptures, and oral traditions) and Sadducees (who held
to the Pentateuch and were associated with the priestly class), John the Baptist rebukes and calls for their
repentance. Despite their physical genetic association with Abraham, it did not mean they were true children of
In Romans 2:28-29, Paul reveals that God’s
definition of a "Jew" is not based on physical circumcision, genetics or adherence to the Law, but instead based
on whether one’s heart is intrinsically circumcised – the mark of a true Christian.
In consideration of the biblical context of the New Testament, the term "daughter of Abraham"
does appear to be in reference to a believing woman, and that she was demonized.
Jesus’ rebuke of Peter (Matt 16:22-23;
When the Greek text is examined, the use of the term "Satan" here is not preceded by the
definite article. Thus the term "Satan" does not function as a proper name but rather as a common noun meaning
"adversary" (i.e. not "the adversary").
Jesus’ rebuke of Peter is not identifying him as "Satan" but instead identifying him as an
"adversary." Peter does not have a demon, such as Satan, residing in him or controlling him.
Examine the cases of possible demonic invasion of Christians after the crucifixion of Christ and Pentecost:
Ananias and Sapphira’s deceit and greed
After selling a piece of land, Ananias and his wife Sapphira conspired to tell Peter that their
offering was the full selling price when they actually kept a portion of it. In verse 3 Peter said, "Ananias, why
has Satan filled your heart to lie to the Holy Spirit and keep back some of the price of the land?"
The Greek term "filled" (plēroō), which is also found in
Ephesians 5:18 (…be filled by the Spirit), means to "fill when
there is something lacking or absent."
It is not clear whether Ananias and Sapphira were inhabited by a demon or controlled by Satan,
however, they were at least filled with a motive to lie to the Holy Spirit such as a temptation or lust for greed
(one of Satan’s temptations – Luke 4:5-7) and willfully acted
to satisfy that lust. Peter judged them for their deceit and lust. To learn more about Ananias and Sapphira and
the liklihood that they were not Believers, see
Testing the Holy Spirit… The Mistake of Ananias and Sapphira.
The immoral Christian (1 Cor 5:1-13).
In this instance Paul confronts the Corinthian church for its inability to recognize that a man
who was having a sexual affair with his stepmother as a sin of immorality.
Contrary to the literal sense which suggests the demonic wish of one Christian to another,
Paul’s use of the phrase "handed over to Satan" is a figure of speech intended as an expression for the sinner’s
excommunication from the church body in hopes that he would recognize his blatant sin and repent. It is not about
demonization of a Christian.
To learn more about this Paul’s rebuke of this immoral Christian, see
What does it mean to "hand one over to Satan"?
Paul’s thorn in the flesh (2 Cor 12:7-10).
Some commentators have interpreted "a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me"
as evidence that Paul has been demonized in some fashion. Many others understand Paul’s thorn as a metaphor for
a physical ailment or disease such as pain in the head, speech impediment or eye problems.
While there is debate as to what Paul’s "thorn" was, the biblical data is not supportive of
the interpretation that Paul was demonized.
To learn more about Paul’s thorn in the flesh, see
What is Paul’s "thorn in the flesh"?
In reviewing the biblical data, there appear at least two cases where a Believer may have been demonized: King
Saul and the woman who was bent over for 18 years. Both cases occurred before the Ascension of Jesus and the Day
Just before the Ascension, Jesus promises the Apostles, "you will receive power when the Holy
Spirit has come upon you" (Acts 1:8), and shortly after, the
power of the Holy Spirit is manifest on the Day of Pentecost
It is at this time that Christians are graced with the permanent presence of the Holy Spirit (see the articles
The Holy Spirit inside of me?! and
The Holy Spirit in the New Testament… working in the Believer's life…).
This is the principle reason why many believe that a Christian cannot be demonized, and the
Bible does not record any clear instance of a Christian being demonized after the Day of Pentecost.
However there is ample evidence that evil can coexist with good within the Christian namely the conflict
between his sin nature (i.e. "flesh") and the Holy Spirit.
Does this mean that a demon can coexist with the Holy Spirit within the Christian? The Bible
is not explicit in this matter.
Christians clearly belong to Christ, and any demonic attack is only permitted with the
permission of Jesus Christ. So while evil is permitted, it is for a sovereign purpose that may not be easily
understood. This includes demonization if it is possible.
Commentators such as Unger propose that a demon entered a person prior to their conversion to
Christianity and continued to control some part of their life because the sin allowing the demon to remain was
While there is little biblical data to support the thesis of whether a Christian can be demonized, most
evangelical conservatives who hold to this position do so because of their clinical experience dealing with
genuine Christians who appear to be demonized. To see an example of this perspective, see Dr. Karl Payne's article:
Devils and Demons (Oppression / Demonization / Possession).
To see clinical data on cases of genuine Christians who appear to be demonized, consult the references cited below.