A Series on Whether a Christian Can Have a Demon
Can Christians have a demon and / or be controlled by one? Is all sin, problem or health issue a consequence of a Christian's insincere
faith or lack thereof? Is it legitimate to consider a demonic cause of Christian's problem or health issue when normal solutions fail as
remedies? While understanding God's sovereignty is very difficult, there are legitimate concerns among those who affirm the possibility
that Christians can have a demon:
- Failure to recognize the power of demonic forces causes the Christian to underestimate or acknowledge the reality of spiritual
warfare that is upon them. There is a tendency to ignore the spiritual perspective and instead prefer the naturalistic explanation.
- Ignorance and denial of demonization, along with the passionate debate that produces factions within the church, is certainly in
keeping with what Satan would intend.
What biblical evidence is there that supports the position that Christians can be indwelt and demonized? This will review some of the
passages used to support the idea that Christians can be demonized.
Examine the cases of possible demonic invasion of Believers before the crucifixion of Christ and Pentecost:
Cain's angry reaction to God's refusal to accept for his offering (Gen 4:7).
Scholars have long noted the grammatical difficulties and awkward translation of the Hebrew in Genesis 4:7.
The ambiguities are removed by viewing the Hebrew word robes (translated as "crouching"), not as a participle
modifying the term "sin," but as an Akkadian loan word rabisum, which means "demon."
From this perspective, the translation of Genesis 4:7 becomes:
If you do well, will not your countenance be lifted up? And if you do not do well, sin is a demon at the door;
and its [the demon's] desire is for you, but you must master it [the demon].
Some scholars view Genesis 4:7, taken with 1 John 3:12's
characterization of Cain as "of the evil one," as suggesting the possibility that Cain was inhabited by a demon during his rebellion
against God. However, is "demon" used as a metaphor and was Cain a Believer?
Balaam's questionable behavior and status as a prophet of God (Num 22:1-41;
Was Balaam a Believer, because he spoke the word of God?
Some consider Balaam as a Believer, because he was a prophet of God (Num 22:9, 20;
23:5, 16; 24:2).
Since Balaam was noted as a "diviner" or "soothsayer" (Josh 13:22), a supernatural
ability provided by an indwelling demon (Acts 16:16-18), some see Balaam as an example
of a demonized Believer.
While the Bible does not explicitly say that Balaam was demonized, there is evidence that Balaam was not a Believer.
Balaam was never noted as a prophet of God, and the Old Testament prophets condemned the practice of divination and soothsaying
(Is 2:6; 57:3;
Jer 27:9; Mic 5:12).
The New Testament never saw Balaam as an example of a Christian.
Peter compares Balaam to false prophets and teachers (2 Pet 2:15-16).
Jude speaks of non-abiding Christians as being covetousness "in the error of Balaam"
In Revelations 2:14, John refers to the "teaching of Balaam," which
was instructing others to place a stumbling block before the children of Israel. What exactly was John referring to? In this case, the
seduction of the Israelites by the women of Moab to worship Baal (Num 25:1-3) was
attributed to Balaam's apparent advice to Balak as a method to defeat Israel.
The terrorizing of King Saul by an evil spirit (1 Sam 16:14-23;
In this instance, after the Spirit of the Lord departed from Saul (1 Sam 16:14),
an evil spirit comes upon him. From the verbs "on" (1 Sam 16:16) and "upon"
(1 Sam 18:10), there is the suggestion that the evil spirit was external to King Saul.
However, some see Saul's abrupt personality and behavioral change (1 Sam 18:10-11;
19:9-10) as forms of mind and body control seen only in cases of demonization such as
the Gerasene demoniac (Mark 5:1-5).
While the text is absent of any Hebrew words that are similar to the Greek terms for demonization (daimonizomai
and echein daimonion), this is seen as evidence of a demonized Believer.
The trial of Job by Satan (Job 1:6-12;
It should be noted that God had a protective hedge about Job, which prevented any fallen angel from afflicting him. In
allowing Satan's initial assault, God forbade Satan from touching Job. In the second assault, it appears that Satan may have touched Job
and produced the skin boils.
An interesting side note is that it is God who brings up Job's name to Satan's attention!
The woman who was bent over for 18 years (Luke 13:11-16).
In this case, a demonic being was inside the woman. Many theologians debate whether this woman was a Christian or not.
In Luke 13:16, Jesus identifies the afflicted woman as "a daughter
of Abraham." This term is used only once in the New Testament, and the debate is whether Jesus is referring to the woman as a physical
Jew or a believing (spiritual) Jew.
In Luke 19:9, Jesus refers to Zacchaeus as "a son of Abraham," which
identifies him as a Jewish believer. Jesus pronounced Zacchaeus' salvation, because of his faith.
In John 8:37, 56, Jesus identifies the Pharisees as Abraham's
physical descendants; however, He makes the distinction that they are not true children of Abraham
(John 8:37-47). And His discussion is within the context of the Pharisees' spiritual
In Matthew 3:9 and Luke 3:8,
addressing the Pharisees (who were associated with the laymen of Israel and based their faith on the Law of Moses, Scriptures, and oral
traditions) and Sadducees (who held to the Pentateuch and were associated with the priestly class), John the Baptist rebukes and calls
for their repentance. Despite their physical genetic association with Abraham, it did not mean they were true children of Abraham.
In Romans 2:28-29, Paul reveals that God's definition of a "Jew"
is not based on physical circumcision, genetics or adherence to the Law, but instead based on whether one's heart is intrinsically
circumcised – the mark of a true Christian.
In consideration of the biblical context of the New Testament, the term "daughter of Abraham" does appear to be in
reference to a believing woman, and that she was demonized.
Jesus' rebuke of Peter (Matt 16:22-23;
When the Greek text is examined, the use of the term "Satan" here is not preceded by the definite article. Thus the
term "Satan" does not function as a proper name but rather as a common noun meaning "adversary" (i.e. not "the adversary").
Jesus' rebuke of Peter is not identifying him as "Satan" but instead identifying him as an "adversary." Peter does not
have a demon, such as Satan, residing in him or controlling him.
Examine the cases of possible demonic invasion of Christians after the crucifixion of Christ and Pentecost:
Ananias and Sapphira's deceit and greed (Acts 5:1-11).
After selling a piece of land, Ananias and his wife Sapphira conspired to tell Peter that their offering was the full
selling price when they actually kept a portion of it. In verse 3 Peter said, "Ananias, why has Satan filled your heart to lie to the
Holy Spirit and keep back some of the price of the land?"
The Greek term "filled" (plēroō), which is also found in Ephesians 5:18
(…be filled by the Spirit), means to "fill when there is something lacking or absent."
It is not clear whether Ananias and Sapphira were inhabited by a demon or controlled by Satan, however, they were at
least filled with a motive to lie to the Holy Spirit such as a temptation or lust for greed (one of Satan's temptations –
Luke 4:5-7) and willfully acted to satisfy that lust. Peter judged them for their deceit
and lust. To learn more about Ananias and Sapphira and the liklihood that they were not Believers, see
Testing the Holy Spirit… The Mistake of Ananias and Sapphira.
The immoral Christian (1 Cor 5:1-13).
In this instance Paul confronts the Corinthian church for its inability to recognize that a man who was having a sexual
affair with his stepmother as a sin of immorality.
Contrary to the literal sense which suggests the demonic wish of one Christian to another, Paul's use of the phrase
"handed over to Satan" is a figure of speech intended as an expression for the sinner's excommunication from the church body in hopes
that he would recognize his blatant sin and repent. It is not about demonization of a Christian.
To learn more about this Paul's rebuke of this immoral Christian, see
What does it mean to "hand one over to Satan"?
Paul's thorn in the flesh (2 Cor 12:7-10).
Some commentators have interpreted "a thorn in the flesh, a messenger of Satan to torment me" as evidence that Paul
has been demonized in some fashion. Many others understand Paul's thorn as a metaphor for a physical ailment or disease such as pain in
the head, speech impediment or eye problems.
While there is debate as to what Paul's "thorn" was, the biblical data is not supportive of the interpretation that
Paul was demonized.
To learn more about Paul's thorn in the flesh, see
What is Paul's "thorn in the flesh"?
In reviewing the biblical data, there appear at least two cases where a Believer may have been demonized: King Saul and the woman who
was bent over for 18 years. Both cases occurred before the Ascension of Jesus and the Day of Pentecost.
Just before the Ascension, Jesus promises the Apostles, "you will receive power when the Holy Spirit has come upon you"
(Acts 1:8), and shortly after, the power of the Holy Spirit is manifest on the Day of
Pentecost (Acts 2:1-13). It is at this time that Christians are graced with the
permanent presence of the Holy Spirit (see the articles
The Holy Spirit inside of me?! and
The Holy Spirit in the New Testament… working in the Believer's life…).
This is the principal reason why many believe that a Christian cannot be demonized, and the Bible does not record any
clear instance of a Christian being demonized after the Day of Pentecost.
However there is ample evidence that evil can coexist with good within the Christian namely the conflict between his sin nature (i.e.
"flesh") and the Holy Spirit.
Does this mean that a demon can coexist with the Holy Spirit within the Christian? The Bible is not explicit in this
Christians clearly belong to Christ, and any demonic attack is only permitted with the permission of Jesus Christ.
So while evil is permitted, it is for a sovereign purpose that may not be easily understood. This includes demonization if it is possible.
Commentators such as Unger propose that a demon entered a person prior to their conversion to Christianity and
continued to control some part of their life because the sin allowing the demon to remain was never renounced.
While there is little biblical data to support the thesis of whether a Christian can be demonized, most evangelical conservatives who
hold to this position do so because of their clinical experience dealing with genuine Christians who appear to be demonized. To see an
example of this perspective, see Dr. Karl Payne's article:
Devils and Demons (Oppression / Demonization / Possession).
To see clinical data on cases of genuine Christians who appear to be demonized, consult the references cited below.