While the Documentary Theory has not been entirely disproved, biblical criticism has shown the presence of pre-Mosaic sources and
indications of textual updating such as later glosses and elaboration.
Genesis contains pre-Mosaic sources.
Explanatory notes were added to the Old Testament by later copyists.
Errors in copying were introduced by later scribes.
Redactions were made by later scribal communities in an attempt to correct errors introduced by earlier copyists.
Historical criticism has shown that it is difficult to delineate the scope and date of the sources or identify what is pre-Mosaic,
Mosaic, or post-Mosaic. Acknowledging this tests one's understanding of biblical inerrancy.
How does the concept of textual updating reconcile with the belief in the inspiration and inerrancy of the Bible?
Helpmewithbiblestudy.org. All rights to this material are reserved. We encourage you to print the material for personal and
non-profit use or link to this site. If you find this article to be a blessing, please share the link so that it may rise in
search engine rankings.